July 19, 2022
The father of 10 shared that he walked away due to the seller's failure to provide accurate information about fake account statistics, also claiming that they "breached obligations under the deal by firing top managers and laying off a significant number of employees."
For their part, Twitter believes that Musk has acted insincerely from the start, and may have even only shown interest in the massive purchase as part of a publicity stunt. "It's attempted sabotage. He's doing his best to run Twitter down," attorney William Savitt informed the judge.
The 51-year-old's lawyer, Andrew Rossman, says these claims are "preposterous" as his client is the second largest shareholder, meaning he owns even more than the company's board does. "He has no interest in damaging the company," Rossman confirmed.
When forming their original deal, both Musk and Twitter agreed to pay a $1B breaker fee to the other should anyone decide to pull out, but that seems irrelevant now as they're suing one another for far more than that.
As CBC notes, Twitter's request for a quick trial has to do with the company's stock price, which is being impacted by the uncertainty and messiness of the deal.
"The reality is, delay threatens irreparable harm to the sellers," the judge said; tap back in with HNHH later for any updates.
[Via]